Archive for the ‘reviews’ Category

vottd countdown

Sunday, January 18th, 2009

Top of my pops…

w/e 18/01/09

01. Kylie Minogue                            96

02. t.A.T.u                                               55

03. Girls Aloud                                     23

04. Same Difference                         17

05. Sertab Erener                               15

06. Original Broadway Cast          13

07. Lily Allen                                         12

08. Holly Johnson                              09

09. Beyonce                                           07

10. Marvin Hamlisch                        05

11. W.A. Mozart.                                05

 From My Last.fm account (To which, quite frankly, I have become a slaaaaaaaaave, as Ms Jones might have it).

Kylie is understandable; a combination of the release, on Monday, of BOOMBOX, the (really, largely redundant) remix album. Oddly, whilst I have still to purchase Disco 4 by PSB, I rushed to buy this one - due, largely, to the presence of several difficult to obtain otherwise versions of tracks I already had. Turns out that, for once, the ‘dub,’ ‘club,’ and ‘remodelled’ versions were actually worth having, insofar as they, largely, contained enough of the vocal track to make them legally constitute a Kylie track.

t.A.T.u. I have previously discussed here. Are they a couple of pointless faux-lesbian shrews, or a possibly really enjoyable pop project? If the latter, does their musical contribution – limited, it seems, to vocals on tracks other people have worked on – reduce their value? Or does it make their oeuvre, past licky-licky straight boy-pleasing fake  lesbo-pop of any value whatsoever? Well, the latest album “Happy Smiles” (purchased with D’s iTunes gift this Christmas gift), suggests that, if you like Pop music, and you’d like to know where the ballsy nouveau-punk bubble of Girls Aloud came from, you could do worse than research the now married and with-children ex-faux-lesbian girlz. And “Fly on The Wall” is a hit choon. Promise.

Which brings u sot Girls Aloud (GA). What can I say other than “Strippers and the vicars in the back.” They’re gettin’ played. Including – so often – the Girls on 45, Loving Kind (psb ahoy) and classic (and largely ignored) non- single trax on the last album (badly-presented Tangled up).

Love. Them. And not just Mrs Cole. Really.

Same Diff. Thanks to Stu for passing this one along. And I mean that the same way la Winehouse thanks the man who first passed along the Rock. Cheers, Love. Now I’m hooked, and likely to be sweeping my stoop at 4am. In pumps.

Sertab – I have but one album of hers – the Post –Eurovision English one. And, by God, it’s GOOD. Play it all the time, hence this appearance.

OBC I’m a homosexual. I’m also intelligent, cultured, in love with a tune, and a lover of filthy and suggestive rhymes. For this reason, I, and lots of heterosexuals, find comfort and succour, in Showtunes. They’re cheaper than crack. Or Same Difference Promos, right now.

Lily and Holly – Good tunes. Nice Lyrics. No more to say, really.

Beyonce: Amaaaazing how two tunes can get so much play. If I were a boy / Shove it up your ring (or whatever the f*** it’s called) are soooo good that I almost forget that Mrs Zee (Zed? I never know) is, basically, a succession of one hit wonders.

Marvin and Wolfie: Yay. Two genius composers who’ve been in my top 10 for years; the one with the wig moreso. By which I mean the one with the powdered periwig. Oh, F*ckit, I mean Mozart – Hammy’s Tonsicular arrangements are none of my biz. Anyways, they both do genius tunes, and Marvin’s Chorus Line (one of many one suspects he’s had a hand in) has been played a lot this week, but, above all. WAM’s sublime music – part high art, part lowculture singalong – just what Kylie, t.A.T.u and Th’Aloud would be fighting for today – has been the cord (chord?) feeding through the 7 days.

Let’s see how it moves next week….

 

 

loving this

Thursday, January 15th, 2009

From the lovely Tallulah Morehead

As for Revolutionary Road, who wants to spend $10 to watch a couple have loud, bitter arguments in the suburbs, when you can stay home and live it for free? So you can see it done in 1950s fashions and hairstyles?

coldwatch # 4

Friday, January 9th, 2009

So. Much. Better.

Still a little ‘coughy,’ and the right nostril keeps seizing up - but whether that’s the cold or my youthful overindulgences coming back to haunt me is debatable. I’m going with the viral infection.

But, all in all, I can confidently say that I can see this cold thing fading. Every day a little more. And yes, it’s a slow and annoying process - I wanted to go back to the gym this weekend, but don’t want to hammer my body if it’s still mending - but it’s happening, and happening progressively, so all’s good.

The weather continues to be bitterly cold and dark and I’ve clearly being living in England too long, if my conversation has now become a series of statements of the bleeding obvious about the weather. It’s January. In Northern Europe. What do you expect?

Good things: The trains have, by and large, been on time (not an unremarkable event, I promise you), and, most importantly of all, IT HASN’T RAINED!

David and I have this ongoing clash over weather: I love the summer - hot days, balmy nights, give me a tropical Island Paradise any time (except, oddly enough, for the two weeks at the end of the year: Christmas is not Christmas if it’s not accompanied by Northern European weather. D, on the other hand, would quite happily Christmas in Australia). D, on the other hand, hates heat. “If I’m cold,” he reasons, “I can put on another layer. But if I’m hot, it’s impossible to take off any more clothes and I’m still uncomfortable.”

You can’t really argue with the logic, but still, I prefer heat. I dislike cold. I LOATHE rain. Loathe it. Snow, I can just about deal with - though it gets a bit hateful when it starts turning to slush. But rain - especially when one has no choice other than to go out in it - is pure spite from Heaven.

And like all spite from heaven - natural disasters, small children falling over - I have no problem watching it through glass - double glazing or HDTV screen, for example - but have no desire to actually partake.

Dinner last night was posh fillet of fish - “Pieces du Poisson,” perhaps? Basically, a six pack of finger rolls. Six Birds Eye Fish Fingers. Bake the fingers, split the rolls. Add to each roll a little salad, a dusting of finely grated cheddar, stuff the baked crispy fish fingers into the rolls, top with a drizzle of (surprisingly sweet) M&S Tartare Sauce, and devour. A bit no-really-cooking, but soooo good.

Lunch today, sadly, will have to be purchased, as the evening ran away with me; I spent it watching my new favourite programme - something that has that twat from Top Gear who isn’t the Clarkson Twat, and features lots of people running around in mud and swimming pools and receiving blows to the head (and not the good sort of blows, neither). I watched it in sheer horror, and found myself laughing and clapping like Liza Minnelli in a biscuit factory. Shameful but fun.

And I finished reading “The Secret Adversary”. This was Agatha Christie’s second published work (at the age of 32) and it is, quite frankly, a preposterous little book. In places, it’s beyond preposterous, but it’s a book I love reading and re-reading. It reminds me in places of some of Herge’s Tintin books. Having started her career with a Poirot detective novel, she, here, goes off on a sort of John Buchan ‘Adventure’ or proto-thriller type of thing so that, as opposed to a classic ‘whodunit’ we get a sort of ‘will-they-manage-to-do-it.’

Where it falls down is that it’s slightly lacking in any real tension - but then many of her books are, being more cerebral than genuinely emotional; the dialogue is a bit odd in places, but the book is 84 years old, and people - of a certain sort - most likely spoke in that “Spiffing, Top Ho,” (where the phrase Top Ho doesn’t refer to an excellent prostitute).

Where it stands is in the basic plotting, and the way that the dénouement, once it comes, is perfectly logical, in light of what’s been laid out before. By which I mean that all the loose ends are tied up, and all the little plot points - the point of which, in the main, has been to diffuse the readers’ suspicion, and create what tension there is - are explained, so the reader doesn’t feel cheated.

The Tommy & Tuppence stories (the two main characters - protagonists seems a rather grand phrase for so many of Christie’s characters) get infinitely better as they progress, so that by the time we get to By The Pricking of my Thumbs  or Postern Of Fate, we’ve got some very good writing indeed. Even N or M, set during WWII, is, if I recall correctly, a cracking good read, with a highly surprising dénouement. But before we get to them, I need to read the short story collection Partners in Crime, which is slated for the book after next.

The weekend awaits, and is scheduled to include a trip to the garage with Sid the Car at 8am tomorrow for his annual checkup and first MOT cert; a haircut; a (frugal) trip to the supermarket; the tidying of, and discarding of as much as I can of, my home filing; writing - I have a final draft of a novel to polish, the first draft of the next novel to start, and a few short stories to tidy and send off to various places. Not all of it will be accomplished, but the first thing, this evening, is to decide what I’m going to do, ‘cos this is the weekend when the writing starts in earnest.

Have a great one, y’all!